The historical revisionism offered on this blog often requires the juggling of four different languages to make sense. Looking backward, these are English, the present medium; Latin, which gave English its Christian morphology; Hebrew, which became the authoritative Jewish text of the old testament; and finally, forgotten in the corner, Greek, which was actually the original language of Judeo Christianity.
According to mainstream history, the ancient Hebrew text of the old testament was translated into Greek and published beginning in 250 BC by the Ptolemies in Alexandria. Paul was written in Greek around 50 CE, and Mark was written in Greek some time after Rome defeated Jerusalem in 70 CE. The first “new testament” was published in Greek by Marcion circa 130 CE. John and Luke and Acts appeared in Greek by 180 CE. Yet the West inherited a bible rendered wholly in Latin.
When studying the bible, it is imperative to give Greek diction priority, since there is no evidence that any Hebrew or Latin scriptures predate it. This requires studying the book first published by the Ptolemies: called the 70, also known as the LXX, the Septuagint, Jewish Bible, or old testament. Unfortunately the original Greek text of the Jewish Bible is not easy to view or translate directly into English, which would allow us to bypass Hebrew and Latin biases. But it can be done.
I made some astounding discoveries while researching the meaning of “Galilee” in relation to the Celtic identity of the Roman Empire. In Greek, “Gal” literally means milk and was used by the Greeks to describe the white Celtic invaders of Asia Minor who settled east of Byzantium after the rise and fall of Alexander the Great. These people were dubbed the “White Greeks” in Latin (Gallograeci). They were known to the Hellenic world as Galatians and Paul wrote them a letter.
The Jewish Bible, first published in the few decades after the Galatians overran Byzantium and settled in Asia Minor, describes the “promised” land as flowing with milk (GALA) and honey. It also makes several references to an indeterminate geographical region called Galilee, which signifies the northern border of Israel with Lebanon. Although in Greek we can see the obvious connection between Gala, Galatian, and Galilee, Hebrew conspicuously muddles the etymology.
In Hebrew, Galilee or “Haggalil” is supposedly short for “Gelil Haggoyim”, which means the circle or the district of the Goyim. A related word, Gelilot, means “borderline” in Hebrew. But Gelilot appears in the original Greek text as ORION: a line or circle of stones. So if Gelil really means circle of stones, and Goyim means nations, then why is “Gelil Haggoyim”, or the “Circle of Nations”, which appears only once (in Isaiah), written as “Galilee” in Greek instead of “Orion of the Ethnos”? Furthermore, why does Joshua build a circle of stones on the northern frontier at “Galgal” (aka Gilgal)? Why does Zechariah 10:10 speak of bringing the Jews back from Egypt and Assyria into “Galaad” (aka Gilead) and Lebanon?
The answer is incredible. The Jewish Bible tells us that Galilee is on the border of Lebanon. The meaning of Lebanon in Hebrew, a supposed reference to snowy mountains, is “WHITE”, just like Gal in Greek. So Hebrew admits that the northern border of Israel (Galilee) is associated with literal whiteness. The name Lebanon appears 71 times in the Jewish Bible and is of major literary importance. So I tracked down the Greek text of the Septuagint to see how Lebanon was originally written. And I was shocked, because throughout the first five books of the Jewish Bible, aka the Torah, Lebanon is only written as ANTILEBANON, which means antiwhite.
In Greek etymology, Lebanon could also refers to the island of Lemnos (white island), and the prefix anti- means “across from”. Anti-Lemnos is therefore across the sea from Lemnos, proximal to Galatia in Asia Minor, southeast of the city of Byzantium. This site is actually called “Gallipoli” - the Hellespont, dividing line between Europe and Asia. Note Gallipoli was not originally the “Very White” place, but Kallipoli or the “Very Beautiful.”
Meanwhile the Jewish Bible describes Antilebanon as the northernmost extent of Joshua’s Semitic/Hebrew reconquest, at the foot of “Mount Hermon” (Aermon or Sky Mountain in Greek), also identified in Deuteronomy 4:48 as Mount Zion (Seon in Greek, or Vision [compare to Sinai, or Seina in Greek]). We have now come “full circle” because we have found the divine syllable; Jew means Sky too. In Greek etymology, Jesus becomes the Sky Savior, and Zion may as well refer to Zeus. Aermon is rendered in Hebrew as Hermon, meaning sacrificial mountain, from Haram, meaning accursed. In Hebrew translation, the “Sky Mountain” becomes the “Sacrifice of Aram”. So what is Aram or Aramea? They were literally the “highlanders”, a civilization that emerged from Asia Minor into the “promised land” long before that promise ever existed. In the beginning, they were Amorites.
Here is the occult knowledge: Hebrew language turns the “sky mountain” into a curse against the very nations who surround it. The word in Arabic is Haram - forbidden. Arabs call Mount “Hermon” the Mountain of the Sheikh (meaning, Mountain of the Chief). But like the rest of us, Muslims are forbidden from knowing the real history of the middle east. The word Arab actually means the same thing as Hebrew: a homeless wanderer. Wiki says, “The oldest surviving indication of an Arab identity is an inscription made in early Arabic using the Nabatean Aramaic alphabet in 328 CE”.
But that’s absolutely false. The Arab identity first appears in the Book of Kings as part of the Jewish Bible, published in Greek sometime before Alexandria fell to Rome in 30 BC. Guess which number is associated with the first mention of Arabs in all of history? “The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents, not including the revenues from merchants and traders and from all the Arabian kings and the governors of the territories” (1 Kings 10:14-15). Both words “Hebrew” and “Arab” share the same root as the name Abraham. They mean, in one sense, stabber.
In Hebrew, Genesis 14:13 describes “Abraham the Hebrew”, which is a pleonasm. But in the original Greek, it’s Abraham the “Piercer”. Likewise, the real Habiru nomads of history were known as criminals and contract killers. In the Bible, YHWH commands Abraham to kill and burn his firstborn son Isaac at a place called Golgol, but then offers a ram in his stead. But what is really being sacrificed by Abraham is ARAM. The Hebrew language displays a clever sleight of hand by replacing the Arameans with Arabians. In fact the Hebrew language itself is stolen from Aramaic. Abraham’s sacrifice of a ram symbolically ended the age of Aries - the very age of the law itself. Thus the law was replaced with a lie.
Let’s take a wiki break to learn more about the modern Mount “Haram”:
The Temples of Mount Hermon are around thirty Roman shrines and Roman temples that are dispersed around the slopes of Mount Hermon in Lebanon, Israel and Syria. A few temples are built on former buildings of the Phoenician & Hellenistic era, but nearly all are considered to be of Roman construction and were largely abandoned during the persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire.
Today, this stand in for “Mount Zion” is “the highest permanently manned UN position in the world, known as ‘Hermon Hotel’, located at 2814 metres altitude” (wikipedia). Meanwhile the rest of the bible defines Zion as Jewish Jerusalem, the city state of the Messiah, and not really a mountain at all.
The flag of the European Union could represent the Galilean “circle of nations”; or the twelve stones arranged by Joshua at Golgol/Galgal before he attacked Jericho:
Strangely enough, after Joshua conquers the area, Antilebanon turns into Lebanon. This happens between Joshua 9:1 and Joshua 11:17. The first five references in the Greek scriptures are to “Antilebanon” and the following 66 are to “Lebanon”. This must symbolize Joshua’s conquest and literal redefinition of the regions. But this difference is erased in the Hebrew, Latin, and English translations.
Today, the name Anti-Lebanon refers to the mountain range on the east side of Lebanon that defines its border with Syria. But if the Torah is referring to these mountains, why does their name change in the book of Joshua? Why does Latin, Hebrew, and English then HIDE the name of Antilebanon in the Jewish Bible? Deuteronomy 3:25 offers a clue: “Let me go over and see the good land beyond the Jordan—that fine hill country and Antilebanon.” So if Antilebanon is a mountain range, why is it mentioned in addition to “fine hill country”?
The Jew Zechariah “prophesies” what will happen to Lebanon in the end of days:
“Open your doors, Lebanon, so that fire may devour your cedars!
Wail, you juniper, for the cedar has fallen; the stately trees are ruined!
Wail, oaks of Bashan; the dense forest has been cut down!
Listen to the wail of the shepherds; their rich pastures are destroyed!
Listen to the roar of the lions; the lush thicket of the Jordan is ruined!”-Zechariah 11:1-3
Felling trees, Saint Boniface would be proud. Zechariah also gives us a preview of the ever delightful Messiah, as YHWH says “I am going to raise up a shepherd over the land who will not care for the lost, or seek the young, or heal the injured, or feed the healthy, but will eat the meat of the choice sheep, tearing off their hooves” (Zechariah 11:15). Zechariah is paid 30 pieces of silver for his poetry but “throws it to the potter”.
This brings us to a crucial point: Jews do not define themselves as a race or a nation. The Goyim are the nations. In Greek, Goyim are the “ethnics”. In Latin, they are the “gens”. Thus from a strictly literal perspective, Jews can be neither the victims of “ethnic cleansing” nor of “genocide”. They have defined themselves as being superior to any ethnicity or genotype. Their “G-d” has promised to elevate their remnant above the nations in a state of eternal privilege. “Jew” actually means “holy” or “divine” and this is how Jews conceive of themselves: not a nation of people, but of priests.
By using the words Galilee and Galgal, the old testament evolves to suggest the northern neighbors of Israel were actually the “white Greeks”, or Galatians. Since Hebrew in turn defines Galilee as the circle or district of the nations, the concepts of whiteness and Goyim are highly correlated in Jewish ontology. Furthermore, there is good reason to believe that the unique Hebrew rendition of “Galilee” in Isaiah, the “circle of the Goyim”, refers not to a borderland, but to a capital region, as in the District of Columbia. This makes sense if the original geographical reference was to “Antilebanon” or “Across from Lemnos”: just southeast of Byzantium, a capital of the Roman Empire.
So where is the original sky mountain? Genesis describes a mountain called Ararat, where Noah’s ark comes to rest after the flood. This has been identified with the highest mountain in Asia Minor. Ararat is obviously related to Aram, and indeed it is the namesake of Armenia, the first state in the world to adopt Christianity. Mount Ararat appears to be the original Mount Zion, Olympus of the eastern Mediterranean, a summit east of the Anatolian highlands. The ancient kingdom of Armenia became part of the Seleucid empire after being conquered by Alexander the Great. This means that Armenia was governed by the same people who controlled Jerusalem when the Jewish Bible was first published. It makes sense that the earliest versions sought to claim not only Judea, but Aramaea/Armenia as well. Armenia became a client kingdom of Rome in 66 BC, and Marc Antony, the fictional relative of Julius Caesar, momentarily defeated Armenia in 34 BC, right before the official dawn of the Roman Empire.
Thus Antilebanon is actually Anatolia, Aermon/Zion is Ararat, and Byzantium is Galilee: the white capital or dividing line of the nations, and eastern seat of the Roman Empire. In other words, the land claimed first claimed by the Torah includes all of modern Turkey. Jericho, or Iereixo in Greek, could be another pun: it literally means “probably a holy city”. This could actually represent the ancient polity of Urartu (City of Ararat) at the foot of the eponymous mountain in Armenia. Just like Jerusalem is Ierosaluma in Greek and Urusalim in ancient “Semitic”, Jericho is Iereixo is Urartu, probably.
The center of Urartu was a lake called Van, possibly taken from the word Vanili in the lost Urartrian language. Could we have another “White Lake” on our hands? Unsurprisingly, we find that the Garden of “Eden” may signify Anatolia/Armenia as well: the paradaisical garden, source of four rivers, from the Ugaritic root ‘dn, meaning a fruitful place of waters. This association is confirmed by the Epic of Gilgamesh, the blueprint for Genesis, when Gilgamesh cuts down the holy Cedar groves of Lebanon, floating them down to Nippur in Mesopotamia. This again indicates that Lebanon was originally Anatolia. Meanwhile Nippur was the holy city of Enlil: the father of the Sumerian Gods, subject only to the sky. Enlil’s temple in Nippur was called the House of the Mountain, from which issued the first law of civilization. Enlil became El after the first “Semites” (actually Amorites and Akkadians) came down to Sumer from their holy mountain, and the newly merged deity El/Enlil became the God of the first empire on Earth, and later the namesake of the Elohim.
Here’s another interesting point of translation: In Hebrew, YHWH introduces himself to Abraham as “El Shaddai” - the “Supreme God of the Mountain”. But in the original Greek, YHWH is merely “Theos sou euarestei” - the “God Who Pleases You”. The Hebrew Bible slips El Shaddai into many other unrelated points of text. YHWH is usurping the throne of El, a theme also encountered in Greek and Latin mythology. Like Zeus overthrew Cronus, YHWH overthrew the Elohim.
By coming down from Galilee/Lebanon to “redeem” the Jews, Jesus is coded as Celtic or white. We can confirm this by his explicit reflection in the myth of Caesar, when Julius comes down to Rome from Gallia. Josephus, one of the pioneers of Christian eschatology and a major source for the gospel of Mark, commanded the region of Galilee during the Jewish Roman war. Like Mark, Josephus frames the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus, who came down through Galilee from Rome, as the divine judgment of YHWH against Jerusalem and the feuding cults therein.
We conclude that perhaps Titus actually came from Antilebanon, in other words Galatia, and that the “district of the nations” in Isaiah really means “the capital of white peoples”: Byzantium. This would confirm that Roman Byzantium predates Roman Italy, and Latin history was invented later. As we shall see in my next post, the first capital of Rome could have actually been Sirmium. Jesus Christ was not a historical figure; he symbolizes and “predicts” the military campaign of Titus Flavius. According to Mark (and Josephus), it is the Roman Flavians who will be the new Messiahs. And Julius Caesar was not historical either. A copy of a copy of Joshua.
So what does this revision of Jewish Roman history mean for the Jews? In my opinion, not much. On one hand, you can see why Ptolemy’s heirs, people of great learning and culture who invented the 7 day week, would resent the fact that white settlers from central Europe had invaded the Mediterranean, adopted Hellenic culture, and begun a new Empire in the footprint of Alexander. The Celts overran Byzantium some time after the death of Alexander, and the Ptolemies responded by creating a brand new religion adapted from the history and mythology of the wider world. The purpose of Judaism has always been explicit: to “reclaim” foreign lands.
But my sympathy ends there. The Jewish Bible is a hateful document. It has defamed divinity itself and driven people away from God with the idea of a creator who cannot wait to take terrible vengeance upon nature and humanity. Did not Alexander’s empire conquer the Persians, who had conquered the Neo Babylonians, whose city had been occupied by a steady stream of conquerors reaching back to Sargon of Akkad? There is nothing inherently evil about one people conquering another. But there is something inherently evil about one people claiming that “G-d” has chosen them to destroy every nation and race for eternity. There is something inherently evil about passing off such a stark political assertion as both spiritual revelation and historical fact. This is why we must not take Christianity literally either.
Races start and races end; races mix together and rivers run ceaselessly into the ocean. What matters more to humanity are principles. Logos. Do Jews have any?
[Note: this is the last post to carry my pseudonym “gay troll” on the byline. I now write under my chosen name. For more gay troll, see https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=gay+troll. Love, Max.]
Peeling back these various bad translations of the Bible is fascinating, especially given the important role both the OT and NT have played in our world.
It reminds me a little of how Robert Faurrison stumbled across the Hoax of the 20th Century when he was trying to find an appropriate translation for the term "gas chamber."
Things are going to get very interesting as these rotten foundational stories start to crumble. Thank you for your invaluable research and findings.
I wonder (and I realize this is a bit "out there") if the whites were originally the "tall whites" alien race people talk about today from another "GALaxy"? As many like Paul Wallis and Mauro Biglino et al. have shown, the "G-d" of the OT was one of the many "Powerful ones" (Elohim) who "from the heavens came down) demanded sacrifices and gold etc. from people. Maybe the tall whites drove them out (they seemed to have left the area rather suddenly), and Judaism was created as a cargo cult awaiting their return (which idea has been transferred by the Xtians to Jesus).
Also, I read in one of the many books on the origins of Christianity that up until the middle ages or so, a copy of the New Testament included Josephus's Antiquities of the Jews and Wars of the Jews, probably because his writings helped make sense and give context to the NT (Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah has shown that Mark's gospel is a metaphor of Titus's campaign against Jerusalem and the Jews and that Saul/Paul's job was to spread the word).